Provide whatever information you have to a mod or raise an abuse report detailing where you found the pics that have caused your suspicion.
If each message was duplicated only once it would seem possible that there are in fact couples using two different profiles (as some couples do to allow both parties to chat individually). However if the you received three different mails around the same time, all of which have been duplicated, this is unlikely.
You could consider providing the profile names to a mod on a private email (not on this forum) and we would look into it further.
Lass, you have kept it vague and that is appreciated. Anyone responding to this post please bear in mind this user retains a right to privacy and discretion; as do his family. His passing is very sad and he shall be missed. I personally am unwilling to pass on his username or the circumstances of his death if asked.
****Please do not post venue details on this forum. It will be deleted, possibly without the forum generator seeing it. All suggestions should be mailed directly to Lisa. Thanks****
A stricter sign-up process: it's an unlikely scenario for a site such as this. Who is going to sign up to a site where they are asked to perform identification procedures which are contrary to the ethos of the site....... discretion and a person's right to privacy. I certainly would not have joined if I had been asked to provide photo I.D. at the first stage; I did not have a web cam at that time.
The best thing I can say is......... if it walks like a dog, smells like a dog and acts like a dog....ask it to speak. If it says quack then it's not a dog. Buy a mobile sim card for site use, insist on-web cam early in the interaction. If you don't have a web-cam......... come back to me when you do! Again going back to discretion, I can understand some people do not wish to have photos of themselves on the site. That is perfectly acceptable but for me it is required that they are provided to an off-site email address if no web-cam is available at first. If I'm interested I will still require that web-cam chat so start shopping!
Until this and several other requirements are met I won't be too interested in chatting about meeting; I've learnt it isn't always time well spent.
Yeah but ya won't be able to photoshop the reality ha ha:thrilled:
Bomb I hope you get some replies; so far you seem like good craic. Best of luck and I'll be seeing ya at the singles meet with my retractable measuring tape!
Sporty .......... obvious question but it has to be asked. Why ask us....... why not ask the lady in question? No one better suited to answer it!
She squirted........... how many women have you met who P*** themselves just cus you enter them???? :lol2: Women in porn are practiced, it's an action they have cultivated to provide the best camera action i.e high volume secreted at high force. It's something that can vary each time sometimes with a shooting flow and sometimes with a splashy element to it. Women who have been doing it longer probably can control it better and so it would appear like it does in porn
I do believe I have seen 1mac on cam.......... does live cam feed not supercede photos? Maybe it might be nice if we went to profiles and instead of looking at/for pics straight away we checked the date a member joined in order that unecessary embarassment is not yet another reason we end up losing members before they have even settled in.
1mac welcome to the site. Fair play to you, straight into chat and putting your face on cam. I wish you many many successes.
You are correct Mrhornydub there are no dibs on names that may be used on this site, apart from the permanent site rooms . This may room may have been set up innocently with no sinsiter motives by a person perfectly entitled to use any name they wished once it abided by site guidelines.
As already stated it may also have been the result of a system glitch. However, should someone have set the room up to imitate another it was a pointless act and not very well thought through. Should the intention have been to imitate the usual Suzie of Suzieschat then it would have been necessary to have the actual profile owner present in the room to make the ruse effective. I fail to see how any person could have thought this would prove successful and so would suggest it was one of the first two options. I agree with Amber that should it seem someone is being deceptive in their portrayal of themselves or the theme of a room then it should in fact be highlighted ........ and I do not mean people claiming to be six foot tall when they are in fact only five foot ten, I mean a blatantly false portrayal which may have a negative impact on the chat room/ site atmosphere. To use this incident as an example surely it's logic that naming a room suzies chat would suggest there would in fact be a suzie to chat to at some point.
I wouldn't dream of speaking for all women.............
No worries Eden, would be horrific to think someone who didnt want to do it was attempting it! Would not go well. SHE :laughabove: says the trick is to breath out at that critical point as it involuntarily relaxes your muscles, take a deep breath and suffer the consequences!
But in saying that SHEvery rarely does it and only with certain men.
I have a friend (ha ha ha ha) who doesn't use lube. SHE far prefers the natural sensation without it being softened by third party substances :laughabove:
Dragon.......... hurt people cause hurt, damaged people try to cause damage and bad people try to turn things bad. Luckily your upset is transient, it will pass. Some people surely must have a hard time living with themselves. You're a lady; deep breath, head high and happy chatting.
ha ha ha don't ya just hate when someone hijacks your thread :taz:
..if i met you in regular life id :doggy: the sexy ass off ya:P
:eeek:.