:giveup::scared: Join the most popular community of Irish swingers now
Login
losmags
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female, 54
0 km · County Mayo
Forum
Master of Sex
Quote by user=avalonpat
i think a real swinger can be defined by the following criteria... someone who can have sex purely for pleasure..with no emotional individual who recognises anothers right to explore their sexuality without hindrance or moral issues clouding their judgement.
i have to say that, while i can see where ur coming from here, u have just defined most of the male population of the planet with the first part of ur definition :giggle:.
Master of Sex
well, i have to say i find surfdudes attitude both patronising and annoying? who are these folks who set themselves up as arbiters of what should and shouldn't happen here, or who is or isn't a "real" swinger? it may take some folks weeks, even months to both gather their courage and find someone they feel comfortable having sex with. we had our first full meet within 2 weeks of joining the site as total newcomers, but by the same token haven't had a meet now for 2 or 3 months...are we not "real" any more coz we haven't had a meet for a while??
Get over urself surfdude.
:crazy::doggy: Master of Sex
having waited with baited breath when GW was up for reelection, only to be disappointed by the utter stupidity of the american public i've decided to hold my own elections...vote for me, we'll put a fence round the good old US of A and shoot every last one of them that tries to get out
If that brilliant (if i do say so myself) plan for some reason fails, i think im moving to mars'.:smoke::giveup:
:inlove:
If that brilliant (if i do say so myself) plan for some reason fails, i think im moving to mars'.:smoke::giveup::inlove: 
Master of Sex
righto...i can see what's happened here...someone on the "drugs"thread mentioned taking a moral stand against drugs....i pointed out that more people would consider swinging immoral than smoking a joint. westie then suggested a thread about the morals of swinging...and here we are, confusing morals with religious dogma, getting all wrapped up in justifying what we get up to. ho hum. morals develop and exist outside the framework of religion, abrahamic or otherwise....societies that have no overt religious beliefs (there have been a few) still operate according to a code of morals...i.e. that which is considered socially acceptable behavior. That doesn't mean that behaving "immorally" is harming others, it means that the majority of society doesn't approve of the behavior. people who object to something on moral grounds generally do so because there are no prima facie reasons for doing so, but it offends their delicate sensibilities, so it must be wrong, which is why moral arguements have become the preserve of the religiously enfeebled...aggggh, don't get me started on religion ffs...i'm an atheist living in a very religious country...i feel like a man with one eye in the land of the blind. Ibelieve it was Carl Mark who said "religion is the opiate of the masses" ... i'm sure tussey will correct me if i'm wrong on that (ye pinko leftie!).
